HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Daniels, W.L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Daniels, W.L. Agricola Articles by Stewart, B.R. Articles by Daniels, W.L.

Physical and Chemical Properties of Coal Refuse from Southwest Virginia

Dep. of Crop and Soil Environ. Sciences, Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Coal refuse is difficult to reclaim due to high potential acidity, very coarse texture, low water retention, and fertility. This study was undertaken to determine the physical and chemical properties and the reclamation potential of samples from 27 coal refuse piles of varying age. Selected physical and chemical properties varied widely across this sample set. The >2 mm fragment content was 60%, and the average texture of the <2 mm fraction was a sandy loam with 15% clay. The mean water retention difference, (–1.50 to –0.030 MPa), on a whole sample basis was 0.08 kg water/kg refuse. The pH varied from 3.0 to 8.3 due to differences in the amounts and reactivity of pyritic minerals in refuse. Older piles generally had lower pH values than more recent piles. The saturated paste electrical conductivity (EC) was higher in the younger refuse due to active pyrite oxidation. A 5:1 water to soil (w/w) extract shows promise as an effective screen for samples with potentially high EC values. Coal refuse was generally low in available P and B. Total elemental analysis revealed that Si, Al, Fe, and K were the most abundant elements. The physical factor most limiting to plant growth is likely to be low water holding capacity, while low pH was found to be the chemical factor most limiting to plant survival. These findings indicate that some refuse piles may be suitable for direct seeding, but many will require heavy lime and/or organic treatments for successful reclamation.

Contribution of Dep. of Crop and Soil Environ. Sciences, Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.

This research was supported by the Powell River Project, the NSF Graduate Fellowship Program, and the USDI Bureau of Mines, Virginia Mining and Minerals Resources Inst. under contract no. G1184151.

Received for publication June 3, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B.R. Stewart, W.L. Daniels, L.W. Zelazny, and M.L. Jackson Evaluation of Leachates from Coal Refuse Blended with Fly Ash at Different Rates J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2001; 30(4): 1382 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]