HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pantone, D.J. Articles by Forcella, F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pantone, D.J. Articles by Forcella, F. Agricola Articles by Pantone, D.J. Articles by Forcella, F.

Water Quality Impacts Associated with Pre- and Postemergence Applications of Atrazine in Maize

Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ., Blackland Res. Ctr., 808 E. Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502 (formerly North Central Soil Conserv. Res. Lab., USDA-ARS, MN);
North Central Soil Conserv. Res. Lab., USDA-ARS, Morris, MN 56267;
Plant Sci. Res. Unit, USDA-ARS, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
Soil and Water Res. Unit, USDA-ARS, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
Aberdeen Res. and Ext. Center, Univ. of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Herbicide contamination in surface runoff varies greatly depending on the herbicide management alternatives used. This study was conducted to determine if herbicide runoff is influenced by the timing of herbicide application with respect to maize (Zea mays L.) emergence. Preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) applications of atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] were compared during 1988 and 1989 on a field with no prior history of atrazine use on a Barnes loam (fine-loamy, mixed Udic Haploboroll) soil at the Swan Lake Research Farm near Morris, MN. A rainfall simulator applied precipitation events of 50 min with an intensity of 64 mm h^–1 on Days 1,7, and 30 after PRE or POST applications of atrazine. Rainfall 1 d after application resulted in 32 g ha^–1 of atrazine (less than 2% of the amount applied) in the runoff water and sediment for PRE treatments compared with 16 g ha^–1 (less than 1% of the atrazine applied) for POST treatments. Similarly, 7 d after the herbicide applications, 20 g ha^–1 was lost with PRE treatments and 1 g ha^–1 for POST treatments. At 30 d, PRE treatments resulted in 8 g ha^–1 being transported in the water and sediment compared with 1 g ha^–1 for POST treatments. The rate of surface runoff, rather than the concentration of herbicide in the runoff, was the critical factor responsible for the reduction of the quantity of atrazine in the surface runoff with the POST treatments as compared with the PRE treatments.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Louchart, M. Voltz, P. Andrieux, and R. Moussa Herbicide Transport to Surface Waters at Field and Watershed Scales in a Mediterranean Vineyard Area J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(3): 982 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I.J. van Wesenbeeck, A.L. Peacock, and P.L. Havens Measurement and Modeling of Diclosulam Runoff under the Influence of Simulated Severe Rainfall J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 553 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.D. Gaynor, C.S. Tan, C.F. Drury, H.Y.F. Ng, T.W. Welacky, and I.J. van Wesenbeeck Tillage, Intercrop, and Controlled Drainage-Subirrigation Influence Atrazine, Metribuzin, and Metolachlor Loss J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 561 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Ma, J. E. Hook, R.D. Wauchope, C. C. Dowler, A.W. Johnson, J. G. Davis, G. J. Gascho, C. C. Truman, H. R. Sumner, and L. D. Chandler GLEAMS, Opus, PRZM2{beta}, and PRZM3 Simulations Compared with Measured Atrazine Runoff Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2000; 64(6): 2070 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text]