HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olszyk, D.M. Articles by Thompson, C.R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Olszyk, D.M. Articles by Thompson, C.R. Agricola Articles by Olszyk, D.M. Articles by Thompson, C.R.

Effects of Open-Top Chambers on ‘Valencia’ Orange Trees

USEPA, Environmental Research Lab., Corvallis, OR 97333

B.K. Takemoto

California Air Resources Board, Research Div., Sacramento, CA 95812

G. Kats, P.J. Dawson, C.L. Morrison, J. Wolf Preston and C.R. Thompson

University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Open-top field chambers are the most widely used technology for evaluating the impacts of air pollutants on vegetation. This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of chambers on Valencia orange trees (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck). The trees were exposed to ambient ozone (O₃) for 51 months in large (4.3-m diam. by 2.9-m high) nonfiltered open-top chambers (NF) and in ambient air without chambers (AA). During this period, the 12-h daytime (M₁₂) average O₃ concentration was approximately 8% lower, and the cumulative O₃ exposure for hourly average concentrations >0.1 µL L^–1 (SUM₁₀) was 29% lower than for NF than for AA trees. By December 1984 (after eight months in chambers), canopy volume for NF trees was 67% greater than for AA trees; and by March 1988 canopy volume for NF trees was 104% greater than for AA trees (P < 0.001). Specific leaf areas (cm² g^–1) were larger for NF than AA trees (P < 0.05). Total harvestable fruit weight combined for years 1986, 1987 and 1988 was 98% higher for NF than for AA trees (P < 0.01). The higher yield for NF trees was associated with lower immature fruit drop, especially during the growing seasons prior to the 1986 and 1987 harvests (P < 0.01). Warm season (April–October) rates of stomatal conductance and transpiration were 14 and 12% lower, respectively, for NF than AA trees; which coincided with 29% more negative leaf water potentials for NF than AA trees (P < 0.05) . In contrast, cool season net photosynthetic rates were 18% lower for NF than for AA trees, and starch concentrations were 31% higher in leaves from NF compared to AA trees in February 1988 (P < 0.05). Overall, the yield increases for NF compared to AA trees could, in part, be accounted for by decreased flux of O₃ into leaves (based on decreased O₃ exposure and leaf conductance). However, other factors, i.e., increased tree growth, altered leaf C allocation, and lack of wind stress occurring only in chambers, likely contributed to higher NF tree yields.

Research supported in part by the California Air Resources Board under contract no. A2-130-33, A4-134-33 and A733-087. The statements and conclusions are not necessarily those of the U.S. EPA or the California Air Resources Board. This paper has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with materials reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or implied endorsement.

Received for publication February 5, 1991.