JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 20:581-587 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.

Growth and Elemental Content of Two Tree Species Growing on Abandoned Coal Fly Ash Basins

Claire L. Carlson* and Domy C. Adriano

Biogeochemistry Division, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken, SC 29802.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Differences in aboveground tissue concentrations of trace elements were assessed for sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis L.) growing on two abandoned coal fly ash basins and a control soil (Fuquay sand; loamy, siliceous, thermic Arenic Plinthic Kandiudult; pH = 4.99). The "wet basin" (pH = 5.58) had originally received precipitator ash in an ash-water slurry, while the "dry basin" (pH = 8.26) had received both precipitator and bottom ash in dry form. In general, trees from the wet basin exhibited elevated trace element concentrations in comparison to the controls, while the dry basin trees exhibited reduced concentrations. One of the most striking differences in elemental concentrations among the ash basin and control trees was observed for Mn, with the control trees exhibiting concentrations orders of magnitude greater than the ash basin trees. Differences in foliar trace element concentrations among the sites can generally be explained by differences in substrate trace element concentrations and/or substrate pH. While trees from the wet ash basin generally had the highest trace element concentrations, these trees also attained the greatest height and diameter growth, suggesting that the elevated trace element concentrations in the wet basin substrate are not limiting the establishment of these two species. The greater height and diameter growth of the wet basin trees is presumably a result of the greater water-holding capacity of the substrate on this site. Differences in growth and tissue concentrations between sweetgum and sycamore highlight the importance of using more than one species when assessing metal toxicity or deficiency on a given substrate.


NOTES

Present address of senior author is Research Services Office, Bowling Green State Univ., Bowling Green, OH 43403-0180.

Received for publication November 15, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.