HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hendershot, W. H. Articles by Sverdrup, H.U. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hendershot, W. H. Articles by Sverdrup, H.U. Agricola Articles by Hendershot, W. H. Articles by Sverdrup, H.U.

The Mobile Anion Concept—Time for a Reappraisal?

Dep. of Renewable Resources, Macdonald College of McGill Univ., Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, H9X 1C0, Canada;

P. Warfvinge

Dep. of Chemical Eng. II, Lund Univ., S-22100 Lund, Sweden;

F. Courchesne

Dép. de géographie, Univ. de Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada;

H.U. Sverdrup

Dep. of Chemical Eng. II, Lund Univ., S-22100 Lund, Sweden.

^* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The mobile anion concept has been used to support the argument that acid precipitation, containing elevated concentrations of nitrate and sulfate, is acidifying soils and surface waters. We believe that so much attention has been focused on the behavior of the strong acid anions that the effect of other important processes has, in some cases, been obscured. The emphasis, we believe, should be placed on processes that regulate H⁺ in solution. Thus, we propose that the mobile anion concept (as an explanation of how acid precipitation degrades soils and surface waters) be replaced with descriptions of the mechanisms believed to control the movement of both anions and cations through ecosystems.