JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 20:415-420 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, G. A.

Transport and Prediction of Sulfate in Agricultural Runoff

Andrew N. Sharpley* and S. J. Smith

USDA-ARS, Water Quality and Watershed Res. Lab., P. O. Box 1430, Durant, OK 74702-1430;

O. R. Jones

USDA-ARS, Conserv. and Production Res. Lab., Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012;

W. A. Berg

USDA-ARS, Southern Plains Range Exp. Stn., 2000 18th Street, Woodward, OK 73801;

G. A. Coleman

Southern Plains Watershed and Water Quality Lab., P. O. Box 400, Chickasha, OK 73018.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The measurement and simulation of sulfate-S (SO4-S) mobility in agricultural watersheds is necessary to evaluate the effect of management practices on associated crop S deficiencies, enhanced leaching loss of nutrient cations, and acidification of percolation waters. The concentrations and amounts of SO4-S in runoff from six grassed and 13 cropped watersheds in the Southern Plains were, thus, measared over a 4-yr period. Sulfate-S transport in runoff was predicted using an equation describing the kinetics of SO4-S desorption from soil and compared with measured values. No SO4-S was added to any of the watersheds directly as S fertilizer or indirectly in N or P fertilizer material. No difference (at 5% level) in SO4-S concentration in runoff from grassed (mean annual value of 12.6 mg L–1) and cropped (mean annual value of 11.0 mg L–1) watersheds was observed. Differences in amounts (0.2–18.9 kg ha–1 yr–1) were a function of runoff volume as influenced by land management. A general trend of increasing SO4-S concentration in runoff with decreasing pH was observed, which may be a function of S dry deposition and soil and crop conditions. Measured and predicted SO4-S concentrations in runoff for individual events were not significantly different (at 5% level), with an average predictive standard error of 1.6 mg L–1 for all watersheds, representing 17% of the measured concentration. The equation may, thus, provide a predictive tool in agronomic and environmental studies of SO4-S movement in agricultural watersheds.


Received for publication January 15, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.