JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 20:373-380 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, B.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, B.R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Prunty, L.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, B.R.

Lysimeter Study of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Irrigation Rates on Quality of Recharge Water and Corn Yield

Lyle Prunty* and B.R. Montgomery

Department of Soil Science, North Dakota State Univ., Walster Hall, P.O. Box 5638, Fargo, ND 58105.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Accrual of NO3-N to groundwater as a result of agricultural practices is a focus of environmental concern. This inquiry was conducted to quantify precisely in a replicated experiment the rate of N loading to groundwater resulting from inputs of N and irrigation water to corn (Zea mays L.). Input levels were designed to balance potential for high production with minimum loading of NO3-N to groundwater. Four large (2.4 by 2.4 m and 2.3 m deep) drainage lysimeters with reconstructed Hecla loamy fine sand (Aquic Haploborolls) were employed in this southeast North Dakota study. Grain yields at N fertilizer rates of 95 and 145 kg/ha were 10.3 and 11.3 Mg/ha, respectively. Differences in yield due to irrigation and irrigation by N interaction were nonsignificant. There was no residual effect of N fertilizer on yield. The higher irrigation rate caused increases in drainage of water within about 30 d. The higher rate of N fertilizer, however, was not reflected by increased concentration of NO3-N in the drainage water until 325 d after application. The increased concentrations then persisted to 500 d. Flow-weighted means of NO3-N concentrations for this period were 8.6 and 12.3 mg/L for the low and high N rates, respectively. For this soil and climate, irrigation and N management can be tailored to produce NO3-N concentrations below 10 mg/L with continuous corn. However, the 5:1 economic return produced by 50 kg/ha of incremental N fertilizer means that producers are unlikely to adopt the needed practices without incentives.


NOTES

Contribution of the North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. 1888.

Received for publication April 23, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. Dauden, D. Quilez, and M. V. Vera
Pig Slurry Application and Irrigation Effects on Nitrate Leaching in Mediterranean Soil Lysimeters
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2290 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. A. Elmi, C. Madramootoo, M. Egeh, A. Liu, and C. Hamel
Environmental and Agronomic Implications of Water Table and Nitrogen Fertilization Management
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2002; 31(6): 1858 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K.R. Brye, J.M. Norman, L.G. Bundy, and S.T. Gower
Nitrogen and Carbon Leaching in Agroecosystems and Their Role in Denitrification Potential
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2001; 30(1): 58 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.