JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 2:253-258 (1973)
© 1973 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menser, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by McKee, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Menser, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by McKee, C. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Menser, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by McKee, C. G.

Effects of Air Pollution on Maryland (Type 32) Tobacco1

H. A. Menser, G. H. Hodges and C. G. McKee2

ABSTRACT

Six Maryland tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) cultivars were tested for resistance to air pollutants. Fumigation chamber tests disclosed that ozone used at 5 pphm for 6 hours destroyed about 10% of the leaves of ‘Catterton’, and injured 5 to 8% of the leaves of other cultivars. Ozone administered for three hours at 15 pphm damaged about one-third of the leaves and injured about two-thirds of the leaf surfaces when the concentration was increased to 30 pphm. When plants were exposed to 22 pphm for 3 hours, injury was 2 to 8% greater than was observed at 15 pphm. ‘Wilson’ was more resistant to ozone than ‘Maryland 10’, ‘Maryland 59’, ‘Maryland 64’, ‘Maryland 609’, and Catterton. Maryland 10 and Maryland 59 tended to be as ozone-susceptible as Catterton. Maryland 64 and Maryland 609 resembled the ozone response of Wilson. None of the differences in susceptibility were statistically significant except between Catterton and Wilson.

Ozone and sulfur dioxide mixtures acted synergistically to inflict ozone-type symptoms on all Maryland cultivars. No injury resulted when plants were fumigated singly for 4 hours with ozone at 3 to 3.5 pphm and sulfur dioxide at 45 to 50 pphm. The combination of these gases at the same concentrations and time interval produced 5 to 15% leaf injury. Twice as much injury occurred when mixed gases were used for 2 hours at 10 to 12 pphm ozone and 45 to 50 pphm sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide injury thresholds were barely reached by a 3-hour exposure at 150 pphm. Estimated injury ranged from 2 to 6%.

Stomatal characteristics of the six cultivars varied within a 3 cm2 area of a leaf at prime ozone susceptibility. Stomatal frequency may have been a more important factor controlling ozone injury than the diameter of apertures. Catterton and Maryland 10 showed almost 10 stomata/field compared to 6 stomata/field on leaves of Wilson.

Field studies in the five-county Southern Maryland District disclosed a general correlation between resistance to ozone and resistance to weather fleck. Wilson, Maryland 64, and Maryland 609 were more fleck tolerant than Maryland 10, Maryland 59, and Catterton. Fleck was more severe in counties that were adjacent to Washington, D. C., and Baltimore, Maryland. Extensive fleck damage occurred, however, at a location 42 miles south/southeast of the District of Columbia. The severity of symptoms on Maryland cultivars and on such fleck-susceptible cultivars as ‘BeI-W3’, ‘Burley 21’, and ‘Havana 142’ suggested that during periods of air stagnation, oxidants probably exceed 10 pphm (Mast) throughout most of the Type 32 area, and are responsible for most of the fleck damage.

Key Words: photochemical smog • leaf damage • genetic response • Nicotiana tabacum L.


NOTES

1 Contribution No. 4562, Scientific Article A1773 of the Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Dept. of Agronomy. Cooperative investigations of the Plant Genetics and Germplasm Inst., Agr. Res. Cent., ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Md., 20705, and the Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Dept. of Agronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md. 20742.

2 Research Plant Physiologist and Research Assistant, Tobacco Lab., Plant Genetics and Germplasm Inst., Agr. Res. Cent., ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Md. 20705, and Associate Professor of Agronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md. 20742.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.