JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 19:687-694 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aschmann, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aschmann, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aschmann, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.

Nitrogen Status of Forest Floor, Soils, and Vegetation following Municipal Wastewater Sludge Application

S. G. Aschmann*

Code 2431, Pacific Div., Naval Facilities Eng. Command, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860;

M. S. McIntosh, J. S. Angle, R. L. Hill and R. R. Weil

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Agricultural land near urban areas is commonly used as disposal sites for municipal wastewater sludge. As available agricultural land decreases in the Northeast, the feasibility of applying sludge to established hardwood forests is increasingly being considered. A major concern with this practice is the potential for the large quantities of nitrogen in sludge to be detrimental to the forest ecosystem. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in nitrogen storage in several components of a hardwood forest amended with municipal sludge. In June 1986, aerobically digested liquid sludge was surface applied to a Maryland hardwood forest at rates of 0, 3, 6, and 12 dry Mg ha–1, corresponding to nitrogen Ioadings of 0, 200, 400, and 800 kg N ha–1, respectively. Soils from the 0 to 10 and 10 to 20 cm soil depth were analyzed for extractable NO3-N and NH4-N in the spring and fall of 1986 and 1987. Standing litter, litterfall, and leaves of five overstory and seven understory species were analyzed for total nitrogen annually. The first year following sludge application, total extractable nitrogen in the surface 10 cm of soil ranged from 28 mg kg–1 soil in the control to 125 mg kg–1 under the 800 kg N ha–1 treatment. Within two years, total extractable N in the soil surface was not significantly different among treatments. Nitrogen concentration in litterfall increased with increasing sludge rates but only during the second year after sludge was applied. Nitrogen in the standing litter of the 800 kg N ha–1 increased in response to sludge the first year after application, indicating that decomposition was accelerated in sludge-treated plots. The second year after sludge application, foliar nitrogen concentration was increased with increasing sludge rate in two of five tree species and four of seven understory species. The total nitrogen uptake was small compared with the total available nitrogen. Low rainfall in 1986 and 1987 may have limited nitrogen uptake by the vegetation.


NOTES

Contribution of the Maryland Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. .

Received for publication May 16, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
V. F. Meyer, E. F. Redente, K. A. Barbarick, R. B. Brobst, M. W. Paschke, and A. L. Miller
Plant and Soil Responses to Biosolids Application following Forest Fire
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.