JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 19:683-686 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, S. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blevins, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, S. D.

Tillage Effects on Sediment and Soluble Nutrient Losses from a Maury Silt Loam Soil

R. L. Blevins* and W. W. Frye

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091;

P. L. Baldwin

USDA-SCS, Mt. Vernon, MO 65702;

S. D. Robertson

Lexington, KY.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

As the role of nonpoint-source contamination of surface waters becomes more evident, increasingly more attention is focused on the effects of agricultural practices on soil erosion and water quality. Tillage systems are known to affect the amount of water moving over the surface and through the soil. This study compared the contributions of three tillage systems used in corn (Zea mays L.) production with (i) sediment losses and surface runoff and (ii) the potential for nonpoint-source surface water pollution from N and P fertilizers and triazine herbicides. Tillage treatments were no-tillage, chisel-plow tillage, and conventional tillage (moldboard plow plus secondary tillage). The study site was on a Maury silt loam (Typic Paleudalfs). Over the 4-yr period, conventional tillage runoff volume was 576.7 kL ha–1, chisel-plow 205.7 kL ha–1, and no-tillage 239.9 kL ha–1. Total soil loss from conventional tillage was 19.79 Mg ha–1, chisel plow 0.71 Mg ha–1, and no-tillage 0.55 Mg ha–1. Amounts of NO3, soluble P, and atrazine leaving the plots in surface runoff were greatest from conventional tillage and about equal from chisel-plow and no-tillage. The magnitudes of the losses in surface runoff water were small for all chemicals measured.


NOTES

Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky. Published as paper no. 89-3-74 with approval of the Director of Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn., Lexington.

Received for publication April 21, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.