JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 19:488-495 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heggestad, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lesser, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heggestad, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lesser, V. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heggestad, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lesser, V. M.

Effects of Ozone, Sulfur Dioxide, Soil Water Deficit, and Cultivar on Yields of Soybean1

Howard E. Heggestad*,

Climate Stress Lab., USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705;

Virginia M. Lesser

Dept. of Biostatistics, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The effects of ozone (O3) stress on bean yields and seed size of four soybean cultivars [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown in open-top chambers in 1981, 1982, and 1983 are presented. The O3 treatments included charcoal filtered (CF) and nonfiltered (NF) air, and 0.03, 0.06, and 0.09 µL L–1 O3 added 7 h d–1 to NF air. The effects of SO2 in concentrations from 0.005 to 0.224 µL L–1 (4 h d–1, 5 d wk–1) from the seedling stage to maturity were studied in 1981 and 1982. In 1982 and 1983 the effects of soil moisture stress (SMS) and well-watered (WW) soil conditions on the response of soybean to O3 stress were determined. The primary objective was the evaluation of 3 yr of soybean data from our site using the nonlinear Weibull and the polynomial dose-response models to relate yield responses to O3 exposure doses. The variables also included SO2, soil moisture, and cultivar. The homogeneity of the response equations were compared to permit development of the smallest set of homogeneous equations over years. Both O3 and SO2 negatively impacted bean yields and seed size. No interactions between O3 and SO2 were indicated. With the Weibull model, interactions between O3 and soil moisture were observed with ‘Forrest’ in 1982 and ‘Williams’ in 1983. With an O3 level considered typical in soybean production areas (seasonal 7 h d–1, 0.055 µL L–1) compared to background O3 (0.025 µL L–1) and using all data from 3 yr of experiments, the Weibull model predicted the same (15%) mean yield loss under both SMS and WW regimes.


NOTES

1 The use of trade names in this article does not imply endorsement by the USDA. Although this research was partly funded by the USEPA, it has not been subjected to USEPA review, therefore it does not necessarily reflect their views and no official endorsement should be inferred.

(present address, 3112 Castleleigh Road, Silver Spring, MD 20904)

Research partly supported by interagency agreement between USEPA and the USDA, no. 12-14-7001-1282.

Received for publication May 30, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.