JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 19:402-408 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J. C.

Nutrient Export in Stormflow following Forest Harvesting and Site-Preparation in East Texas

W. H. Blackburn* and J. C. Wood

USDA-ARS, Northwest Watershed Res. Ctr., 270 South Orchard, Boise, ID 83705.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

In December 1979 nine small (2.57 to 2.79 ha) watersheds in East Texas were instrumented to determine the effects on stormflow water quality of: (1) clearcutting, shearing, windrowing and burning; (2) clearcutting, roller chopping, and burning; and (3) undisturbed control. Nutrient losses and concentrations, pH, electrical conductivity, and turbidity were not significantly different for all pre-treated watersheds. The first year following harvesting and site preparation, most nutrient losses and concentrations were greater from the sheared and chopped watersheds than from the undisturbed watersheds. Most nutrient losses and concentrations during the second and third post-treatment years were not significantly different from the chopped and undisturbed watersheds, but continued to be significantly greater from the sheared watersheds than from chopped or undisturbed watersheds. During the fifth post-treatment year all nutrient levels except for K+ losses were not significantly different for all treatments. Although nutrient losses from all treatments were small, shearing and windrowing had the greatest impact on nutrient export. Roller chopping as applied in this study had a minimal impact on stormflow nutrient losses and should not degrade water quality.


NOTES

Field research was done when the authors were with the Range Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX. This study is part of the South Central Region Water Quality Project.

Received for publication November 15, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. W. McBroom, R. S. Beasley, M. Chang, and G. G. Ice
Water Quality Effects of Clearcut Harvesting and Forest Fertilization with Best Management Practices
J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 114 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.