JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 19:339-346 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banwart, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Banwart, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Banwart, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hassett, J. J.

Sensitivity of Twenty Soybean Cultivars to Simulated Acid Rain

W. L. Banwart*, R. L. Finke, P. M. Porter and J. J. Hassett

Dep. of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Efforts to assess the effect of acid rain on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] have shown variable results. Simulated acid rain has been reported to cause increases, decreases, and no significant effect on yield. Although few parameters were identical among the diverse studies reported in the literature, one common difference was the choice of cultivar. In this study, 20 soybean cultivars were screened to determine their relative sensitivity to simulated acid rain. Soybean was grown in 1984, 1985, and 1986 in field plots in east central Illinois. Plots were protected from ambient rain and treated twice weekly with simulated rain of pH 5.6 (control) or pH 3.0. Early in each growing season visible leaf injury was noted for all 20 cultivars, and level of injury was significantly higher for plants receiving the more acidic treatment (pH 3.0). Average yield for the 20 cultivars was approximately the same when plants were treated with simulated rain of pH 3.0 as when plants were treated with stimulated rain of pH 5.6. Over all 3 yr, the group V cultivars Essex and Forrest yielded more grain and had more chaff dry matter, pods per hectare, and pods per plant with the more acidic pH treatment than with the control treatment. Only ‘Williams 82’ yielded significantly less with the more acidic pH treatment than with the control treatment. The results suggest soybean cultivars may respond differently to applications of highly acidified rainfall, but none of the cultivars tested were extremely sensitive to growth and yield reduction.


NOTES

Contributions (in part) from CSRS special grants for Acid Deposition Research Program (SGP-004-1983) and USDA grant 85-CRC-1-1785.

Received for publication May 4, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.