JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 18:550-554 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.

A Semiautomated Instrument for Measuring Total and Radiolabeled Carbon Dioxide Evolution from Soil

Daniel R. Shelton* and Timothy B. Parkin

USDA-ARS, Building 050, Room 100, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The design and operation of a semiautomated instrument for measuring total and radiolabeled CO2 evolution from soil is described. In the recirculation mode, headspace gases are recirculated in a closed loop through an infrared (IR) detector. After a steady state is achieved, the concentration of total CO2 is read and recorded. In the flush mode, compressed air is used to flush CO2 from the headspace into test tubes containing trapping solution. Radiolabeled carbon dioxide is quantified by counting aliquots of trapping solution in a liquid scintillation counter. The variability associated with the IR detector is 3.6% (coefficient of variation). The trapping efficiency is 100% (±2.0%). The variability associated with two different methods of pesticide application to soil was also investigated. With the slurry method, aliquots of air-dried soil were added to a pesticide solution [carbofuran(2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranyl methylcarbamate)] with thorough mixing. With the spray method, the carbofuran solution was applied as an aerosol to soil that had been previously wetted. There was little difference in the variability of total CO2 production between the two methods. The variability associated with 14CO2 evolution from soil (carbofuran hydrolysis), however, was greater with sprayed soil than with slurred soil, suggesting that the slurry method resulted in a more homogenous distribution of pesticide throughout the soil. The low analytical variability associated with measurements of total CO2 and 14CO2 production, as well as the large number of samples that can be accommodated (up to 94 flasks or intact soil cores) make this instrument ideal for the execution of the large screening studies needed to obtain reliable estimates of the spatial variability of rates of pesticide degradation.


NOTES

Contribution from the USDA-ARS.

Received for publication December 1, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.