JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 18:120-126 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emmerich, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shirley, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Emmerich, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shirley, E. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Emmerich, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shirley, E. D.

Comparison of Lumped and Distributed Models for Chemical Transport by Surface Runoff

W. E. Emmerich*, D. A. Woolhiser and E. D. Shirley

USDA-ARS, Aridland Watershed Management Research Unit, 2000 E. Allen Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

A simple, complete mixing model is used to evaluate the degree of distortion involved in modeling chemical exchange and transport at the soil surface as a lumped rather than a distributed process. A complete mixing model was coupled to the kinematic cascade model, KINEROS, to provide a distributed representation of chemical exchange and transport. A lumped model was developed by ignoring spatial variations of chemical concentration in overland flow and in the mixing zone. Chemical concentration and transport predicted by the alternative approaches were evaluated for total transport, arrival time, peak concentration time, and peak concentration. Total chemical transport was virtually unaffected by model form. However, significant differences were found in arrival and peak concentration times as well as peak concentrations when chemical was placed only in the upper plane of a two plane cascade. The lumped model predicted significantly lower peak chemical concentrations and arrival times that were too short. A lumped model provides a good approximation for transport from a single plane, but caution should be used when a lumped model is used to describe chemical exchange and transport on a cascade of planes.


NOTES

Contribution of USDA-ARS, Aridland Watershed Management Research Unit.

Received for publication June 22, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. Furman
Modeling Coupled Surface-Subsurface Flow Processes: A Review
Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 741 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.