JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:619-622 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, S. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Richter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, S. E.

Wet Deposition Estimates from Long-Term Bulk and Event Wet-Only Samples of Incident Precipitation and Throughfall

D. D. Richter*

School of Forestry and Environ. Studies, Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706 (formerly Environ. Sci. Div., Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.);

S. E. Lindberg

Environ. Sci. Div., Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., Oak Ridge, TN 37831.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

This report describes a 2-yr study comparing two sampling systems that are used to measure major ionic constituents in incident precipitation and canopy throughfall: long-term bulk sampling vs. event-based, wet-only sampling. Major deviations in chemical concentrations (SO2–4, NO3, K+, Ca2+, and H+) were documented between the two sampling systems, deviations that were ion-specific in both incident precipitation and throughfall. Differences in chemical concentrations between the two sampling systems were greater (i) during the growing than during the dormant seasons, and (ii) for incident precipitation (collected in the open) than for throughfall under chestnut oak forest (Quercus prinus L.) canopies. Nutrient-cycling processes in forests may be misinterpreted if flux data are based solely on long-term bulk samplers of incident precipitation and canopy throughfall. For example, comparison of bulk and wet-only throughfall solutions suggests that when bulk samplers collect throughfall under hardwood canopies, the ability of hardwood canopies to increase pH of low pH precipitation may be overestimated.


NOTES

Research sponsored by the Electric Power Res. Inst. (RP-1813-1; RP-1907-1) and by the Office of Health and Environ. Res., U.S. Dep. of Energy, under contract no. DE-AC05-84OR21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Partial support for manuscript preparation received from the Integrated Forest Study on Effects of Atmospheric Deposition, coordinated by Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. and sponsored by the Electric Power Res. Inst., and from the School of Natl. Resour., The Univ. of Michigan, and the School of Forestry and Environ. Studies, Duke Univ. Publication no. 2974, Environ. Sci. Div., ORNL.

Received for publication April 3, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.