JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:469-473 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korcak, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Korcak, R. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Korcak, R. F.

Fluidized Bed Material Applied at Disposal Levels: Effects on an Apple Orchard

R. F. Korcak*

Beltsville Agric. Res. Center, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Atmospheric fluidized-bed combustion represents an economical technology for the burning of high S fossil fuel. The combustion residue is a dry, alkaline material resulting from the burning of coal (or other fuel source) and limestone. Although the residue has been assessed as a limestone substitute, the current study examines the potential for disposing of relatively large quantities. Fluidized bed material (FBM) was applied at two rates to the surface area within the rows of an established apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard containing four tree types. The rates were either 9.2 kg/m2 (low rate), 36 kg/m2 (high rate), or untreated control. The tree types used were ‘Spuree Rome’ on M9, ‘Redchief Delicious’ on M9 or M9/MM106, and ‘Sturdeespur Delicious’ on M9. Cumulative yields (kg/tree) were enhanced on three of four tree types over a period of 6 yr. A 15% reduction in yield was noted for Redchief Delicious on M9/MM106 stocks at the high FBM rate. No nutritional related problems were noted for this or any other of the tree types used. Part of the yield reduction noted was due to fruit size differences and/or differential sensitivity of this interstock/rootstock combination to the altered soil chemical properties. Generally, amended soil pH increased to about 7.0 for either rate, and electrical conductivity increased five fold at the high rate of FBM addition. Agricultural utilization of large volumes (up to 112 Mg/ha) of FBM, compared to past research where FBM was used as a lime substitute (2–6 mg/ha), appears to be a feasible alternative. However, rootstock selection for apple may need to consider the resultant changes in soil chemical status from FBM additions.


NOTES

Contribution from the Fruit Lab., Beltsville Agric. Res. Ctr., USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD.

This research was supported in part by a grant from ERDA, Washington, DC.

Received for publication August 18, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.