JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:376-384 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steenhuis, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Muck, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steenhuis, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Muck, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Steenhuis, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Muck, R. E.

Preferred Movement of Nonadsorbed Chemicals on Wet, Shallow, Sloping Soils

Tammo S. Steenhuis*

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-5701;

Richard E. Muck

USDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Preferred movement of chloride and nitrate during runoff events following nutrient application was studied experimentally on 109 m long fields with a hard pan at shallow depth near Ithaca, NY. Chloride and nitrate applications were surface-applied and incorporated at 36 and 69 m uphill from the collection point. All of the applied chemicals, when surface-applied on saturated soil, were completely lost in the surface runoff and interflow water. When incorporated, at most 60% of the mass applied was lost. The fraction lost appeared to be related to the initial moisture content of the soil. After a chemical application, the concentration in both runoff and interflow was initially high and then decreased exponentially. The concentrations in the runoff water, interflow, and macropores were approximately equal throughout a runoff event.


NOTES

Contribution from the Dep. of Agric. Eng., Cornell Univ. and U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Ctr.

Received for publication June 30, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, G. W. Gee, Z. F. Zhang, and A. L. Ward
A Modified Vadose Zone Fluxmeter with Solution Collection Capability
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 627 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.