JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:27-34 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter-Potter, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilliland, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baxter-Potter, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilliland, M. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baxter-Potter, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilliland, M. W.

Bacterial Pollution in Runoff from Agricultural Lands

Wanada R. Baxter-Potter* and Martha W. Gilliland

Civil Engineering Dep., Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE 68182-0178.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

A review of the literature reporting the methods and results of studies concerned with the nature of nonpoint source microbial pollution leads to several conclusions: (i) Comparison of data from different studies may be complicated by variation in the choice of indicator organisms, variation in watershed size and homogeneity, and variation in media and procedures for determining fecal streptococcus densities. (ii) The ratio of fecal coliform to fecal streptococcus densities can be used to help identify particular sources of fecal pollution, but its usefulness declines with age. Its usefulness may also be affected by media and procedures used to determine fecal streptococcus densities, particularly when data derived from different media or procedures are compared. (iii) Bacterial densities in runoff from agricultural lands often exceed water quality standards. This is true of virtually all types of agricultural land. (iv) Although some connection between bacterial densities and stream discharge during storm events is apparent, the relationship is not simple. Factors such as temperature, hydrologic proximity of pollution sources, livestock management practices, wildlife activity, fecal deposit age, and channel and bank storage, all affect bacterial densities in runoff. Of these factors, only the influence of fecal deposit age on bacterial releases has been studied and quantified. (v) There is in the literature no loading function to predict bacterial densities in runoff that satisfactorily considers the factors listed above; however, typical density values may be used in a simple loading function to estimate probable density ranges.

Key Words: Coliforms • Fecal streptococcus • Nonpoint source pollution • Water quality • Feedlot management


NOTES

current address: 1532 Rosemary Lane, Apt. D, South Bend, IN 46637.

This work was funded through a grant from the Jane Layman Fund of the Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Received for publication September 22, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.