JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:158-162 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowrance, R.
Right arrow Articles by Smittle, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lowrance, R.
Right arrow Articles by Smittle, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lowrance, R.
Right arrow Articles by Smittle, D.

Nitrogen Cycling in a Multiple-Crop Vegetable Production System

Richard Lowrance*

USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Watershed Res. Lab., P.O. Box 946, Tifton, GA 31793;

Doyle Smittle

Dep. of Hortic., Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Denitrification losses of N and crop uptake of N were measured in intensive vegetable crop production systems on a Bonifay sand soil (loamy, siliceous, thermic, grossarenic Plinthic Paleudults) in the Georgia Coastal Plain. Nitrogen uptake efficiencies for total aboveground biomass averaged 59% of N applied to crops, but only 28% of fertilizer N was removed in crop harvest. Over the course of the study, a total of 388 kg ha–1 of N fertilizer was applied and a total of 90 kg ha–1 was removed in crop harvest. Most of the remainder of the fertilizer N (about 290 kg ha–1) was available for leaching as nitrate (NO3). Even though N fertilization rates were high, denitrification rates were low, <2 kg ha–1 yr–1. Additions of nitrate and glucose to undisturbed soil cores showed that denitrification was limited by C availability and by lack of anaerobic conditions in the field. In the first year of the study, denitrification rates before fertilizer addition and irrigation were higher than after. The method of fertilizer application (broadcast vs. applied in irrigation water) had no effect on denitrification rates or crop N uptake.

Key Words: Denitrification • Sand soils • Water filled pore space • Irrigation • Fertilizer • Fertigation • Water quality


Received for publication April 27, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
R. Lowrance and R. K. Hubbard
Denitrification from a Swine Lagoon Overland Flow Treatment System at a Pasture-Riparian Zone Interface
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S.C. Whalen
Nitrous Oxide Emission from an Agricultural Soil Fertilized with Liquid Swine Waste or Constituents
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 781 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.