JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 17:130-134 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, G. A.

Soil Water Depletion Under Crops on Reclaimed and Undisturbed Soils

S. A. Schroeder* and G. A. Halvorson

North Dakota State Univ. Land Reclamation Res. Ctr., Northern Great Plains Res. Ctr., Mandan, ND 58554.

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Soil water depletion by profile depth increments and total water usage were measured yearly under either small grains or corn (Zea mays L.) over a 4-yr period on undisturbed Williams loam (fine-loamy, mixed Typic Argiborolls) and soil reclaimed following simulated stripmining. The reclaimed soil had topsoil thicknesses of either 0.23, 0.46, or 0.69 m respread over nonsaline, nonsodic spoil materials whose textures were gravelly loamy sand with and without a clay loam subsoil, clay loam, or silty clay loam. Total water usage and soil water depletion (for profile depths of 0 to 0.6 m and 0.6 to 1.5 m) were consistently greater, but essentially significant (P = 0.10) only in 1 yr, for the undisturbed compared to the reclaimed soil (averaged over topsoil thickness or spoil texture). Grain or biomass yields were significantly higher for the undisturbed compared with the reclaimed soil when growing-season precipitation was inadequate or poorly distributed. Shallower rooting depths and thus lesser soil water depletion even though the reclaimed soil had similar amounts of plant-available soil water at planting for 3 of the 4 yr resulted in water stress conditions and reduced potential productivity in inadequate precipitation years on the reclaimed soil. Similar water-use efficiency values were found for both the undisturbed and reclaimed soils for all 4 yr. If amounts of available soil water at planting and soil water depletion values had been more uniform between the undisturbed and reclaimed soils, the reclaimed soil most likely would have met the reclamation law requirement of "equal or better than" productivity present prior to mining (undisturbed soil productivity) for all 4 yr.

Key Words: Reclamation • Spoil • Water-use efficiency • Topsoil thickness


NOTES

Contribution from the North Dakota State Univ. Land Reclamation Res. Ctr., Mandan, ND 58554.

Received for publication October 28, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.