JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 16:334-340 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.

Acidic Deposition and Tree Growth: II. Assessing the Role of Climate in Recent Growth Declines1

David C. LeBlanc, Dudley J. Raynal and Edwin H. White2

ABSTRACT

Detailed stem analysis was used to measure historical growth of three coniferous tree species assumed to represent a wide range of susceptibility to potential acidic deposition effects on cation leaching. Sample trees were growing on an outwash plain in even-aged monoculture plantations with similar stand histories and soils. Stepwise multiple regression was used to assess relationships between observed variations in growth and climatic variables. The ring-number sequence, a relative measure of historical tree growth that did not require standardization, was particularly useful in analyses of growth-environment relationships for young trees that exhibit consistent apical growth. Species/site groups assumed to be more susceptible to acidic deposition effects exhibited significant decreases in growth after 1960, but these decreases were correlated with climatic variables. Growth-climate relationships derived for the pre-1960s period did not predict decreases in tree growth observed during the mid-1960s and late-1970s, indicating a lack of time stability in growth-climate relationships. This may be due to many factors, including maturation, climatic anamolies, and/or acidic deposition effects. This correlational study can not establish cause-and-effect relationships between tree growth and climate or acidic deposition. Independent confirmation and studies of the physiological mechanisms involved are needed to substantiate these results.

Key Words: Dendroclimatology • Growth-climate model • Ring-number sequence • Verification


NOTES

1 Contribution of the State Univ. of New York College of Environ. Sci. and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210. This project was supported by fund from the USDA McIntire-Stennis Program, the New York State Energy Res. and Development Authority, and the Empire State Electric Energy Res. Corporation.

2 Research scientist, Holcomb Res. Inst., Butler Univ., Indianapolis, IN 46208; professor and professor of forest soils, SUNY Coll. Environ. Sci. and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210.

Received for publication October 28, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.