JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 16:325-333 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LeBlanc, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by White, E. H.

Acidic Deposition and Tree Growth: I. The Use of Stem Analysis to Study Historical Growth Patterns1

David C. LeBlanc, Dudley J. Raynal and Edwin H. White2

ABSTRACT

Radial growth of three coniferous tree species, representing an assumed spectrum of susceptibility to acidic deposition effects on cation leaching, was analyzed by detailed stem analysis to determine if a decline in growth, unrelated to natural determinants of growth, has occurred since the 1950s. Various measures of tree growth derived from detailed stem analysis are shown to be very useful in assessing tree growth responses to environmental factors. Correlations between breast height and whole-stem analysis data were highly variable and generally poor for two of three species studied. Species/site groups identified as potentially more susceptible to acidic deposition effects exhibited synchronous decreases in growth after 1960, but the initiation of decreased growth was coincident with documented climatic anomalies (drought and winter temperatures) and cannot be directly attributed to acidic deposition effects. Quantitative dendroclimatological analyses are necessary to assess the relationship between these episodes of decreased growth and climatic variables before the role of potential acidic deposition-mediated effects can be evaluated. The role of acidic deposition in the observed growth declines cannot be discounted based on our analyses. However, tenable alternative hypotheses involving the action of natural determinants of growth (climate and maturation) are presented.

Key Words: Dendroecology • Stand history • Growth layer profile


NOTES

1 Contribution of the State Univ. of New York College of Environ. Sci. and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210. This project was supported by funds from the USDA McIntire-Stennis Program, the New York State Energy Res. and Development Authority, and the Empire State Electric Energy Res. Corp.

2 Research scientist, Holcomb Res. Inst., Butler Univ., Indianapolis, IN 46208; professor and professor of forest soils, SUNY Coll. Environ. Sci. and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210.

Received for publication October 28, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
Reconstruction of Tertiary Metasequoia forests. I. Test of a method for biomass determination based on stem dimensions
Paleobiology, June 1, 2003; 29(2): 256 - 270.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.