JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 16:212-216 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wauchope, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wauchope, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wauchope, R. D.

Tilted-bed Simulation of Erosion and Chemical Runoff from Agricultural Fields: II. Effects of Formulation on Atrazine Runoff1

R. Don Wauchope2

ABSTRACT

The concentrations and loads of atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine] in runoff water from "tilted-bed" soil trays under intense simulated rainfall were similar to losses reported in field studies. Atrazine was applied at rates of 2.7 to 3.4 kg/ha as emulsion, wettable powder, dispersible liquid, and dispersible granule formulations, on a loam soil in eight 2.2- by 1.2-m trays tilted to 1.3% slope. In simulated storms in which 3 cm of rainfall fell in 5 min and generated 0.7 cm of runoff, total atrazine losses ranged from 4 to 8% for the emulsion and dispersible-liquid applications and 9 to 12% for the dispersible-granule and wettable-powder formulations. One-fifth of the total losses occurred in the first liter of the runoff. This initial "flush" loss of atrazine in the water front resulted in concentrations up to 23 mg/L in the first runoff depending on the differing particle sizes of the spray deposits of the different atrazine formulations. The tilted-bed/rainfall simulator system appears to offer promise as an inexpensive and convenient supplement to field experiments for characterizing pesticide movement or yield in runoff and evaluating the potential of new chemicals for nonpoint source pollution.

Key Words: nonpoint source pollution • rainfall simulation • pesticides • registration • pesticide mobility


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Lab., Stoneville, MS 38776, and USDA-ARS Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, Tifton, GA 31793.

2 Research Chemist, USDA-ARS, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, Tifton, GA 31793.

Received for publication September 18, 1986.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. J. Krutz, C. H. Koger III, M. A. Locke, and R. W. Steinriede Jr.
Reduced Surface Runoff Losses of Metolachlor in Narrow-Row Compared to Wide-Row Soybean
J. Environ. Qual., July 17, 2007; 36(5): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.