JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 15:251-254 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cure, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cure, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cure, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.

Crop Yield Response Predicted with Different Characterizations of the Same Ozone Treatments1

William W. Cure, John S. Sanders and Allen S. Heagle2

ABSTRACT

Data were obtained from three field experiments studying the effects of chronic doses of ozone (O3) on crop yield. All used open-top exposure chambers. Two were of the same design with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in 1977 and 1978 and the third was with peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in 1980. Exposures had been conducted for 7 h each day starting shortly after crop emergence and ending with maturity. Each experiment included a treatment level below ambient, two at ambient levels, one within and one outside of a chamber, and two to three treatments at levels above ambient established by adding different but constant amounts of O3 to ambient air. Three different characterizations of each O3 treatment were compared as independent variables in simple linear O3 dose-yield response models. Ozone treatments were characterized as (i) the seasonal mean of the daily 7-h means ("7-h mean"), (ii) the seasonal mean of the daily maximum 1-h mean concentrations ("1-h mean"), and (iii) the seasonal maximum 1-h mean concentration (1-h max). The ratio of the 1-h mean to 7-h mean concentration in each treatment was very similar over the range of treatment levels in an experiment. Models of the same yield data developed with either seasonal mean could probably be used interchangeably by converting between concentration scales with a constant multiple. The relation between the 1-h max concentration and either of the seasonal means changed with treatment level within an experiment and was different for similar treatments in different years. The range of yields predicted with models based on 1-h max concentrations using the maximum and minimum ambient O3 concentrations in the 3 yr of these experiments was three to four times that obtained with either seasonal mean model.

Key Words: dose-response models • air pollution • photochemical oxidants • Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Arachis hypogaea L.


NOTES

1 Cooperative Investigations of the USDA-ARS, North Carolina State Univ., and the California Air Resources Board. Paper no. 9133 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7601.

2 Research Associate, Botany Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7632; Air Pollution Research Specialist, California Air Resources Board, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA 95812; and Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS, Dep. of Plant Pathology and Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7616.

Received for publication July 24, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.