JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 15:140-145 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dann, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dann, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, E. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dann, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, E. S.

Comparison of Methods for Estimating Sulfate Export from a Forested Watershed1

M. S. Dann, J. A. Lynch and E. S. Corbett2

ABSTRACT

Seven methods of estimating sulfate export from a forested watershed in central Pennsylvania were compared. One method involved simple linear regression of discharge and concentration data, two methods were based on regression models in which the concentration data were stratified by flow frequency or duration, two methods weighted the mean concentration by discharge, one method used a simple unweighted mean concentration, and one weighted export according to the length of the sampling period interval. The regression models produced the highest export estimates but were considered statistically invalid because the data set did not adhere to the statistical requirements of independence, normality, and linearity. Weighted and unweighted mean concentration methods gave the lowest estimates of export because they gave less emphasis to high flows during which the majority of sulfate was exported from the watershed. The period-weighted method gave intermediate to high export estimates because it took into consideration the large export of sulfate during high flows. This method appeared to offer the best estimate of sulfate export from the watershed studied within the conditions and limitations of the data set. Although limited to sulfate export from a forested watershed, these results would appear to be applicable to any ion, particularly if the solute concentration of the ion is flow related.

Key Words: ionic export • nutrient flux • nutrient losses


NOTES

1 Contribution from The Pennsylvania State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. 7141, University Park, PA 16802.

2 Former Graduate Assistant and Associate Professor, School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 and Principal Hydrologist, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Exp. Stn., University Park, PA 16802.

Received for publication February 14, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. J. Lewis, M. J. Singer, R. A. Dahlgren, and K. W. Tate
Nitrate and Sediment Fluxes from a California Rangeland Watershed
J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 2202 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.