JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 14:360-363 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, W. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, W. B.

Nutrient Returns from Field-Drying of Logging Residue1

James E. Johnson2, David W. Smith3 and William B. Stuart3

ABSTRACT

Increasing interest in utilizing logging residue for fuel has caused concern over additional nutrient removals from the site. On-site drying of the residue may have an ameliorative effect due to nutrient returns during the drying process. To determine nutrient returns from field-dried logging residue, four red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and chestnut oak (Quercus prinus L.) trees were felled and skidded into a 2-ha clearcut area. Twig and leaf samples were collected immediately after cutting and after 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks of field-drying. Declines in both P and K concentrations in the leaves and twigs were noted over the drying period. When nutrient returns were computed on a kg ha–1 basis the following returns were observed after 16 weeks of drying: N, P, K, Ca, and Mg were 37, 2, 34, 20, and 2 kg ha–1, respectively. These amounts are similar to those cycled annually in litter-fall in Appalachian mixed oak stands, which indicates that from a nutrient conservation standpoint, summer logging followed by field-drying may be comparable to winter (leaf-off) logging in these stands.

Key Words: logging residue • whole-tree harvesting • biomass • nutrient cycling • fuelwood


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Forestry, School of Forestry & Wildlife Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061. Financial support from U.S. Dep. of Energy Grant DT-78-6-01-3069 and McIntire-Stennis funds.

2 Associate professor of Forestry, College of Natural Resources, Univ. of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, WI 54481.

3 Associate professor of Silviculture & Forest Soils and assistant professor of Industrial Forestry Operations, respectively, Dep. of Forestry, VPI & SU, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

Received for publication February 14, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.