JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 14:286-292 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Doctor, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Doctor, P. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Doctor, P. G.

Determining the Number and Size of Soil Aliquots for Assessing Particulate Contaminant Concentrations1

Richard O. Gilbert and Pamela G. Doctor2

ABSTRACT

In this paper the planning of radionuclide and other environmental contaminant studies is discussed. This discussion is based on a study of the relationship between soil aliquot size and the variability between aliquot 241Am concentrations. The study consisted of drawing multiple soil aliquots of size 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 g from a large composite soil sample collected at a nuclear weapons testing area on the Nevada Text Site. These aliquots were then analyzed for 241Am. The between aliquot standard deviation (s) of the data increased ninefold as aliquot size declined from 100 to 1 g. This implies that about 70 times as many 1-g aliquots than 100-g aliquots would be needed to achieve the same precision in the estimated mean of a single field sample. The data suggest a linear relationship between logarithms of s and aliquot weight (w). This relationship is used to determine the optimum w and number, n, of aliquots per field sample that should be used. These results are also extended to a second contaminant (239,240Pu in this case) that is in a ratio relationship to 241Am. Also, an approach is given for obtaining optimum numbers of field samples and number of aliquots per field sample to minimize either total sampling and analysis costs or the variance of the estimated mean. The aliquot data from the 241Am study indicate increasing median and geometric mean concentrations with increasing aliquot size. This happens because as aliquot weight increases there is a decrease in skewness of the frequency distribution of aliquot concentrations. Since the arithmetic mean is not affected (on the average) by a change in skewness, it may be preferred to the geometric mean or median when comparing results from studies that have used different aliquot sizes.

Key Words: statistics • radionuclides • field study design


NOTES

1 Research supported by the Nevada Applied Ecology Group, U.S. Dep. of Energy, Nevada Operations Office, Las Vegas, NV 89114-4100, under Contract DE-ACO6-76RLO 1830.

2 Staff scientist and senior research scientists, Statistics Section, Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA 99352.

Received for publication June 13, 1984.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF THE ICRUHome page
REFERENCES
J. ICRU, June 1, 2006; 6(1): 81 - 84.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.