JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 14:169-174 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Lear, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Augspurger, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Lear, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Augspurger, M. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Van Lear, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Augspurger, M. K.

Sediment and Nutrient Export in Runoff from Burned and Harvested Pine Watersheds in the South Carolina Piedmont1

D. H. Van Lear, J. E. Douglass, S. K. Cox and M. K. Augspurger2

ABSTRACT

Soil and nutrient export in ephemeral flow were studied over a 3-yr period following clearcutting three loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) watersheds (0.60–1.24 ha). Two preharvest, low-intensity prescribed fires had no effect on flow or water quality. Harvesting after the third prescribed fire significantly increased sediment concentration and export, but increases were minor compared with sediment export reported for mechanical site preparation. Nutrient concentrations varied among watershed locations because of differences in surface soil depth, but were generally unaffected by harvest. Because harvest increased runoff, nutrient export (concentration x flow) was generally increased. Results of this study show that loblolly pine stands in the erosive Piedmont physiographic region can be harvested following a series of low-intensity prescribed fires with minimal soil loss or degradation of water quality.

Key Words: erosion • prescribed fire • clearcutting • natural regeneration • water quality


NOTES

1 Research sponsored by the Biomass Energy Systems Div., U.S. Dep. of Energy, under contract W-7405-eng-26 with the Union Carbide Corp.

2 Professor, Dep. of Forestry, Clemson Univ.; hydrologist, USDA Forest Service, Coweeta Hydrologic Lab., Otto, NC 28763; and research foresters, Dep. of Forestry, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29631, respectively.

Received for publication June 29, 1984.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. W. McBroom, R. S. Beasley, M. Chang, and G. G. Ice
Water Quality Effects of Clearcut Harvesting and Forest Fertilization with Best Management Practices
J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 114 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.