JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 14:119-126 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bole, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bole, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, W. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bole, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, W. D.

Irrigation of Forages with Rendering Plant Wastewater: Forage Yield and Nitrogen Dynamics1

J. B. Bole and W. D. Gould2

ABSTRACT

Wastewater from an animal by-product rendering plant containing N, P, and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) at greater than 500, 60, and 500 mg L–1, respectively, was applied to irrigated forages to study the suitability of forage species and the fate of applied nutrients. Applications of 10 and 20 cm yr–1 supplied the nutrients at rates in excess of crop requirements. The treatments were compared with irrigation water and with water supplemented with either fertilizer N and P or C as sugar at rates similar to those in the wastewater. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) yields were doubled by the application of 10 cm yr–1 of wastewater as compared with irrigation water treatments, but alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) yields were not significantly affected. Doubling the wastewater application rate or adding comparable rates of N and P fertilizer did not further increase yields. The wastewater-irrigated alfalfa contained NO3-N levels of 1500 to 1600 mg kg–1 plant material, while reed canarygrass contained about 3000 to 3400. Both these levels would be considered potentially unsafe for livestock feed. There was an accumulation of soil NO3-N levels of up to 30 to 40 mg kg–1 soil throughout the surface 120 cm of soil after 5 yr of irrigation with 10 cm yr–1 of wastewater and two to three times this level with 20 cm yr–1 of wastewater. Higher levels of NO3-N were observed in the soil when N was applied as fertilizer. Soil NH4+-N levels were not greatly affected. A nitrogen balance over 6 yr at the high application rate suggested plant uptake, soil NO3-N, and losses accounted for 30, 25, and 45% of wastewater N and 29, 39, and 32% of fertilizer N. A 1-yr 15N balance after 3 yr of irrigation indicated uptake, soil NO3-N, and unaccounted-for N was about 10, 19, and 71% for wastewater and 15, 33, and 52% for fertilizer N. The greater losses of wastewater N compared with fertilizer N were attributed to enhanced denitrification due to oxidizable C in the wastewater. Attempts to simulate this effect with C as sugar were not effective.

Key Words: effluent • alfalfa • reed canarygrass • phosphorus • carbon • salt • sodium adsorption ratio • nitrogen-15 balance


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1.

2 Research scientist, Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1, and research microbiologist, Allied Corporation, Syracuse Research Laboratory, Solvay, NY 13209.

Received for publication April 2, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.