JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:580-586 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jury, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, W. J.

Behavior Assessment Model for Trace Organics in Soil: IV. Review of Experimental Evidence1

W. A. Jury, W. F. Spencer and W. J. Farmer2

ABSTRACT

Experimental evidence supporting the environmental screening model of Jury et al. (1983) is reviewed and discussed. For several laboratory studies of volatilization, initial and boundary conditions matched those used in our model and simulations were run. In all cases, good agreement was found between predicted and measured volatilization losses, with and without accompanying water evaporation. When five chemicals of widely differing volatility were exposed to identical experimental conditions, the model correctly predicted the relative loss behavior observed.

The convective mobility predictions of the model were shown to be consistent with several laboratory studies of compound leaching, as long as the water flow rate was slow enough (< 0.01 cm/s) to ensure equilibrium between the solution and adsorbed phases.

The Millington and Quirk tortuosity model used in our representation of the soil diffusion coefficient was found to give a good prediction of the water content dependence of the effective diffusion coefficient observed in several studies. The thickness of the stagnant boundary layer predicted from our similarity assumption was shown to be consistent with the apparent thickness inferred from several laboratory and field measurements of volatilization.

Key Words: chemical movement • diffusion • volatilization • leaching


NOTES

1 Contribution from Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sci., Univ. of California, Riverside and USDA/ARS, Riverside, CA 92521.

2 Professor of soil physics, Univ. of California, Riverside; soil scientist, USDA; and professor of soil science, Univ. of California, Riverside, respectively.

Received for publication August 26, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. B. Kester, R. B. Brobst, A. Carpenter, R. L. Chaney, A. B. Rubin, R. A. Schoof, and D. S. Taylor
Risk Characterization, Assessment, and Management of Organic Pollutants in Beneficially Used Residual Products
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 80 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. Wang, G. Wang, S. B. F. Reckhorn, and P. Grathwohl
Volatile Organic Compounds Volatilization from Multicomponent Organic Liquids and Diffusion in Unsaturated Porous Media
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 692 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.