JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:357-361 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thibault, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thibault, D. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Thibault, D. H.

Uptake by Plants and Migration of Uranium and Chromium in Field Lysimeters1

Marsha I. Sheppard, S. C. Sheppard and D. H. Thibault2

ABSTRACT

Plant growth, plant uptake, and the redistribution in soil of U and Cr were studied in field lysimeters. The objective of the experiment was to characterize the plant uptake and migration in the soil of U and Cr when placed at different depths in the unsaturated soil zone within the influence of a water table. Lysimeters with and without vegetation were studied and two soils, and two plant species were investigated.

Total uptake of Cr by the plants was directly proportional to Cr concentration in the soil, over eight orders of magnitude. Thus, independent of the amount of Cr applied, the plant took up a similar fraction, about 0.007. Chromium placement depth in the soil did not influence Cr uptake by the plants although the Cr was relatively immobile in both soils.

Plant uptake of U was independent of plant species and U placement depth for loam soil, but highly dependent on placement depth in sandy soil. In the latter, much more U was taken up by the plants when it ws placed near the soil surface, implying that uptake was dependent upon root activity. Migration of U from the contaminant band was substantial only in the sandy soil.

Key Words: water table • waste disposal • heavy metals • radiotracers


NOTES

1 Paper no. 8099 from the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited-Research Company.

2 Soil Scientist, Soil Scientist, and Technologist, respectively, Environ. Res. Branch, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada R0E 1L0.

Received for publication September 26, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environmental GeosciencesHome page
Plant availability of uranium in contaminated soil from Crucea Mine (Romania)
Environmental Geosciences, September 1, 2003; 10(3): 123 - 135.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.