JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:243-247 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Winchell, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Winchell, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Winchell, L.

Uptake and Photosynthetic Inhibition by Atrazine and its Degradation Products on Four Species of Submerged Vascular Plants1

T. W. Jones and L. Winchell2

ABSTRACT

The photosynthetic inhibitory effect of atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropyl amino-1,3,5-triazine) and three of its major metabolites (deethylated, deisopropylated, and hydroxyatrazine) were determined for four species of submerged macrophytes: Potamogeton perfoliatus L., Ruppia maritima L., Myriophyllum spicatum L., and Zannichellia palustris L. The four species showed a similar response to varied dosages of the parent atrazine compound with an average I1 (concentration at which photosynthesis is inhibited by 1%) for the four species of 20 µg/L and an average I50 (concentration at which photosynthesis is inhibited by 50%) for the four species of 95 µg/L. The three major degradation metabolites of atrazine produced varying degrees of photosynthetic inhibition in the four species, but generally the order of toxicity was deethylated > deisopropylated > hydroxyatrazine with hydroxyatrazine causing an apparent stimulation of photosynthesis in several species. Of four species tested, Myriophyllum spicatum L. was the most resistant to atrazine and its metabolites. The magnitude of the actual uptake of the compounds [µg compound/grams dry wt (gdw) plant] by the plants correlated closely with the photosynthetic inhibitory response, i.e., at the same concentration the uptake of atrazine > deethylated > deisopropylated > hydroxyatrazine. Considering that an extremely high environmental concentration (0.5 mg/L) of deethylated atrazine for an estuary only produced a photosynthetic inhibition of from 20 to 40% in four major species of submerged macrophytes, it is concluded that the degradation products of atrazine tested did not play a major role in the disappearance of the submerged vascular plants from the Chesapeake Bay.

Key Words: herbicide • metabolites • aquatic plants • estuarine • phytotoxic


NOTES

1 University of Maryland Center for Environ. and Estuarine Studies. Contribution no. 1480.

2 Assistant Professor, Horn Point Environ. Labs., Cambridge, MD 21613; and Research Technician, Univ. of Maryland, Princess Ann, MD 21853.

Received for publication May 6, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.