JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:234-238 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bielorai, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bielorai, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Feigin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bielorai, H.

Drip Irrigation of Cotton with Treated Municipal Effluents: II. Nutrient Availability in Soil1

A. Feigin, I. Vaisman and H. Bielorai2

ABSTRACT

The suitability of sewage effluent for drip irrigation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growing on a deep calcareous clay soil (Typic Chromoxererts) was studied during three seasons. Secondary effluent was compared with freshwater at three application rates, the average of which for the three seasons were: low (350 mm yr–1), standard (440 mm yr–1), and high (515 mm yr–1). Fertilizer was applied with the fresh water in order to deliver amounts of nutrients (average for the 3 years) equivalent to those in the effluent that contained 150, 180, and 230 kg N; 32, 37, and 46 kg P; and 80, 100, and 120 kg K ha–1 yr–1 for the three rates, respectively. In addition, the standard amount of fresh water was given with half the quantity of fertilizer, and without fertilizer.

The concentration of available N and P in soil was increased greatly in all effluent and fertilizer-amended freshwater treatments, while available K in the soil was increased to a lesser extent. In general, at equivalent application levels, no significant differences in the level of available N, P, and K in the soil or in their uptake by plants, were detected between effluent and fertilizer-amended fresh water, although dry matter yield as well as N, P, and K accumulation were greater in the high-application-rate effluent treatment. The distribution of NO3-N in the soil profile was controlled by drip irrigation and practically no build-up of NO3 was detected below the 0- to 0.6-m depth layer during the irrigation period (in summer). However, during the rainy, winter season, heavy losses of residual NO3-N occurred, probably mainly through leaching.

Key Words: seed cotton • dry matter • N-P-K uptake


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agric. Res. Org., The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel, no. 783-E, 1983.

2 Soil Scientists and Irrigation Scientist, respectively, The Volcani Center.

Received for publication July 9, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Waste Management ResearchHome page
M.H. Wong and C.K. Leung
Landfill Leachate as Irrigation Water for Tree and Vegetable Crops
Waste Management Research, January 1, 1989; 7(1): 311 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.