JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:204-210 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Federer, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Federer, C. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martin, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Federer, C. A.

Effects of Forest Clearcutting in New England on Stream Chemistry1

C. Wayne Martin, Diane S. Noel and C. Anthony Federer2

ABSTRACT

Differences in stream chemistry between recently clearcut and nearby uncut watersheds were generally small in a wide variety of soil and forest types throughout New England. Water samples were collected during six periods of the year in 1978 and 1979 from 6 entirely clearcut, 32 partially clearcut, and 18 uncut watersheds. The largest differences that could be attributed to harvesting occurred in entirely clearcut watersheds, especially in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. In one area of the White Mountains, inorganic N was 4 times higher (2 mg/L), and Ca was 2 times higher (4 mg/L) in streams from a clearcut watershed than in a nearby uncut watershed. Elsewhere, only minor changes in stream chemistry resulted from cutting; the amount of the cutting response was of the same magnitude as natural variations among streams draining similar watersheds. Clearcutting less than entire watersheds, patch and strip cuts, and buffer strips along streams all appear to reduce the magnitude of changes in stream chemistry.

Key Words: forest hydrology • logging • nutrient cycling • water chemistry • watershed management


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Northeastern Forest Exp. Stn., USDA-FS, Durham, NH 03824. This work was partially supported by a research grant from the U.S. Dep. of Interior, Office of Res. & Technol., Project A-051-NH, through the Water Resour. Res. Center of the Univ. of New Hampshire.

2 Research Forester, Biological Science Technician, and Principal Soil Scientist, respectively, Northeastern For. Exp. Stn., USDA-FS, Durham, NH 03824.

Received for publication March 7, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
A. M. Mannion and A.M. Mannion
Palaeoecological evidence for environmental change during the last 200 years. I. Biological data
Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 1989; 13(1): 23 - 46.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.