JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 13:1-8 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, D. L.

Waterhyacinths for Water Quality Improvement and Biomass Production1

K. R. Reddy and D. L. Sutton2

ABSTRACT

This paper discussed the potential use of waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] for biomass production and for nutrient removal from wastewaters. Warm climates in tropical and subtropical areas are conducive for establishing wastewater treatment systems and biomass production farms with waterhyacinth. Sources of nutrients available to culture waterhyacinths include sewage effluent, agricultural drainage water, runoff from animal waste operations, methane digestor effluent, and water from eutrophic lakes and rivers.

Growth rates of waterhyacinths were found to be influenced by the nutrient composition of the water, plant density, solar radiation, and temperature. Annual yields of waterhyacinth biomass were found to range from 47 to 106 Mg dry wt ha–1 y–1, with approximately 50% of the biomass produced during May through August. About 35 to 50% of the total biomass was roots when plants were cultured in nutrient-poor waters (eutrophic lake water and drainage effluents), while 14 to 25% of the total biomass was roots for the plants grown in nutrient-rich waters (sewage effluent). Waterhyacinth systems were found to be more efficient in N removal (70–80% reduction) than in P removal (40–50% reduction).

A pond with a surface area of 2.65 ha and 1.0 m in depth containing 15 to 30 kg wet wt of waterhyacinth per square meter (750–1500 g dry wt m–2) and a detention period of 7 d is adequate to treat 3785 m3 d–1 [million gallons per day (mdg)] of sewage effluent. This hypothetical system would achieve 70 to 80% N removal, 40 to 50% P removal, and would produce a biomass yield of 690 to 1060 kg dry wt d–1 (13–20 g dry wt m–2 d–1). The biomass upon anaerobic digestion would yield 180 to 280 m3 of methane/d. This is equivalent to 549 to 843 GJ ha–1 of energy from waterhyacinth produced at a rate of 48 to 73 Mg dry wt ha–1 y–1.

Key Words: wastewater treatment • aquatic plants • nitrogen removal • phosphorus removal • anaerobic digestion • water pollution control


NOTES

1 Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. 4868.

2 Associate Professor, and Professor, Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Agric. Res. & Education Center, Sanford, FL 32771, and Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, respectively.

Received for publication March 3, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.