JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:534-537 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, G. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, G. H.

Azinphosmethyl and Fenvalerate Runoff Loss from a Sugarcane-Insect IPM System1

S. Smith, T. E. Reagan, J. L. Flynn and G. H. Willis2

ABSTRACT

Azinphosmethyl {0,0-dimethyl S-[(4-oxo-1,2,3-benzotriazin-3(4H)-yl)methyl] phosphorodithioate} and fenvalerate [(RS)-{alpha}-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (RS)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-methylbutyrate] were applied to sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) runoff plots at rates of 0.84 and 0.22 kg/ha, respectively, 4 times each year in 1980 and 1981 as part of an insect integrated pest management (IPM) system research evaluation for season-long control of the primary sugarcane insect pest, the sugarcane borer [Diatraea saccharalis (F.)]. Runoff samples (water + sediment) were collected within 8 h after each storm and analyzed by gas chromatography. In 1980, runoff losses of azinphosmethyl and fenvalerate were 0.08 and 0.02%, respectively, of the amount applied. Runoff in 1981 was about twice that in 1980, partially accounting for larger insecticide runoff losses measured, 0.55 and 0.56% of that applied for azinphosmethyl and fenvalerate, respectively. The larger 1981 losses also were attributed to shorter time intervals between insecticide applications and runoff events. Azinphosmethyl concentrations in runoff do not appear to be harmful to surrounding aquatic habitats, whereas fenvalerate concentrations might present problems, particularly if applied at 0.22 kg/ha rates.

Key Words: Guthion® • Pydrin® • insecticide • Saccharum officinarum L. • "edge-of-field" concentrations • Diatraea saccharalis (F.) • surrounding aquatic habitats


NOTES

1 Joint contribution of USDA-ARS, and the Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Baton Rouge, LA 70893.

2 Research Chemist, USDA-ARS, Soil & Water Pollut. Res. Lab.; Associate Professor, Entomology Dep., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn.; Associate, Entomology Dep., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn.; and Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, Soil & Water Pollut. Res. Lab., Baton Rouge, LA 70893, respectively.

Received for publication October 9, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.