JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:459-462 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankenberger, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Page, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frankenberger, W. T., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Page, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Frankenberger, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Page, A. L.

Effects of Acidity and Alkalinity on the Stability of Amidohydrolases in Freshwater1

W. T. Frankenberger, Jr. and A. L. Page2

ABSTRACT

The influence of acidity and alkalinity on the enzymatic hydrolysis of amide-N in the aquatic system was investigated by determining the stability of L-asparaginase (EC [Enzyme Commission] 3.5.1.1). L-glutaminase (EC 3.5.1.2), and amidase (EC 3.5.1.4), and urease (EC 3.5.1.5) with respect to pH in three freshwater lakes. The water samples were first incubated at the indicated buffer pH (1–13) for 24 h; then each enzyme was assayed at its optimal pH (pHopt) under standardized conditions. L-Asparaginase retained essentially 100% of its activity within the pH range of 6–7 in Lake Evans and Lake Matthews, and 5–7 in Lake Perris. L-Glutaminase was active between pH 6 and 7 in the water samples surveyed. Amidase remained completely active at pH ranges of 4–8 in Lake Evans, 4–7 in Lake Matthews, and 5–8 in Lake Perris. Urease remained active over a broad pH range of 5–9 in Lake Evans, 5–8 in Lake Matthews, and 4–8 in Lake Perris. There was a progressive loss in enzyme activity below and above these pH ranges. The results suggest that the decline in aquatic amidohydrolase activities in relation to the pH-profile near their pHopt was caused by a reversible reaction involving the ionization or deionization of functional groups of the active center of the protein, but under highly acidic or alkaline conditions (pH < 4 to > 9) the reduced activity appears to be due to irreversible inactivation of the enzyme.

Key Words: enzymes • L-asparaginase • L-glutaminase • amidase • urease • amides


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sci., University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

2 Assistant Professor and Professor, respectively, Univ. of Calif., Riverside.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.