JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:412-414 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholaichuk, W.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nicholaichuk, W.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nicholaichuk, W.
Right arrow Articles by Grover, R.

Loss of Fall-Applied 2,4-D in Spring Runoff from a Small Agricultural Watershed1

W. Nicholaichuk and R. Grover2

ABSTRACT

The loss of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) applied in fall to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on fields of Wood Mountain loam soil in semiarid southwestern Saskatchewan was measured in surface runoff from snow. The range of runoff volumes over the 6-y period was representative of runoff observed over a 30-y period at the same location.

The loss of 2,4-D was greater from the treated stubble compared with fallow, which served as the control. The average loss from the control of 1.3 g/ha gives an indication of background limits that can be expected if 2,4-D is applied a year earlier.

The 2,4-D loss in snowmelt runoff is similar to losses in rainfall runoff from a severe storm soon after application.

The 6-y average loss was 4.1% of the amount applied (0.42 kg/ha). Correlation analysis showed the amount of loss to be a function of runoff.

The average flow-weighted mean concentration of 31 µg/L was well below the USEPA maximum permissible level of 100 µg/L, and slightly above the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering objective of 20 µg/L for drinking-water standards.

Key Words: snowmelt runoff • water quality • herbicide movement • water pollution


NOTES

1 Contribution of Research Stations, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, S9H 3X2, and Regina, Saskatchewan, S4P 3A2.

2 Research Scientists, Research Station, Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Swift Current, Sask., and Regina, Sask., respectively.

Received for publication May 17, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. J. Cessna and J. A. Elliott
Seasonal Variation of Herbicide Concentrations in Prairie Farm Dugouts
J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 302 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. J. Cessna, J. A. Elliott, L. Tollefson, and W. Nicholaichuk
Herbicide and Nutrient Transport from an Irrigation District into the South Saskatchewan River
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2001; 30(5): 1796 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.