JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:346-350 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.

Nitrogen Loss From a High-Fertility, Rotational Pasture Program1

L. B. Owens, R. W. Van Keuren and W. M. Edwards2

ABSTRACT

A beef cattle-pasturing system involving four rotationally grazed summer pastures (SG) and four pastures used rotationally for winter grazing/feeding (WGF) was studied on sloping upland watersheds in Ohio to determine effects of livestock management on N levels in water. Both summer and winter areas annually received 224 kg N/ha as NH4NO3 fertilizer. Surface runoff was collected automatically during runoff events, and subsurface flow was sampled from spring developments on a weekly basis. Although seasonal N concentration and transport in surface runoff tended to be greater in the area occupied by the cattle, N concentration and transport in runoff from the two areas were quite similar and did not significantly impair water quality, based on U.S. Public Health Standards. The NO3-N concentration in the subsurface flow from the WGF area was higher than in the subsurface flow from the SG area. The NO3-N concentration in the subsurface flow from both areas increased progressively throughout the study period, and reached levels as high as 18 mg/L. The subsurface flow provided the main pathway for N transport, with the surface transport being approximately 20 and 14% of the total N transport from the SG and WGF areas, respectively. The amount of sediment-N transported was very small because of low soil loss.

Key Words: water pollution • winter grazing • grazing systems • nonpoint source pollution • agricultural practices • nitrate transport


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, Coshocton, OH 43812, in cooperation with the Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed, Coshocton; Professor of Agronomy, Ohio Agric. Res. & Dev. Center; and Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed, respectively.

Received for publication August 23, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. B. Owens and J. V. Bonta
Reduction of Nitrate Leaching with Haying or Grazing and Omission of Nitrogen Fertilizer
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.