JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:341-346 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.

Hydrology and Soil Loss From a High-Fertility, Rotational Pasture Program1

L. B. Owens, R. W. Van Keuren and W. M. Edwards2

ABSTRACT

Five small watersheds (0.25–3.1 ha) on sloping uplands in eastern Ohio were used to evaluate environmental effects of a beef management program of rotational summer grazing on one area, and rotational winter grazing/feeding with stored hay on another area. During the 5-y study, annual precipitation was 1080 mm, which was 8–15% greater than the long-term average. The surface runoff was measured by precalibrated H-flumes, and automatically sampled using Coshocton wheels. Surface runoff from watersheds with beef cattle management increased, compared with the long-term averages when hay was grown on the watersheds. Greater precipitation was the primary factor causing more runoff during the growing season (May–October), and the cattle management was a major contributing influence on the runoff increase during the dormant season (November–April). Maintenance of good vegetative cover on the study areas was a major factor in limiting annual average surface runoff to < 110 mm, which was a relatively small amount. The large runoff events, although a small percentage of the total number of events, produced most of the runoff volume. Soil loss from these pastures was minimal.

Key Words: surface runoff • soil erosion • water balance • watershed • winter forage


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, Coshocton, OH 43812, in cooperation with the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed; Professor of Agronomy, Ohio Agric. Res. & Dev. Center; and Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed, respectively.

Received for publication August 23, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.