JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:236-242 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolverton, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Duffer, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolverton, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Duffer, W. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wolverton, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Duffer, W. R.

Microorganisms and Higher Plants for Waste Water Treatment1

B. C. Wolverton, R. C. Mc Donald and W. R. Duffer2

ABSTRACT

Batch experiments were conducted to compare the waste water treatment efficiencies of plant-free microbial filters with filters supporting the growth of reeds (Phragmites communis), cattail (Typha latifolia), rush (Juncus effusus), and bamboo (Bambusa multiplex). The experimental systems consisted of two components in series. The first component was an anaerobic settling-digestion container. The second was a "nonaerated" trough filled with rocks, decreasing from large rocks (up to 7.5-cm diam) at the bottom, to pea gravel (0.25- to 1.3-cm diam) at the top. The plant-free microbial filter was equally effective in carbonaceous BOD5 (5-d biochemical O2 demand) removal. The vascular aquatic plant series enhanced ammonia removal, and consequently improved nitrogenous BOD5 removal. Under the conditions of these experiments, raw sewage with initial BOD5's of 100 mg/L can be upgraded to meet secondary standards with 6 h in component 1, and 6 h in a plant-free filter or filter using cattail, rush, or reed. When initial BOD5's are approximately 450 mg/L, 24 h in component 1, 29 h in a reed filter are required to meet secondary standards. Total N removal studies were conducted, which demonstrated that a reed system is capable of removing NO3-N and NH3-N simultaneously, probably through a common NO2-N intermediary, then to N2. Overall, the reed system was superior to all others evaluated in this research project.

Key Words: microbial filter • Phragmites communisTypha latifollaJuncus effususBambusa multiplex • domestic waste water


NOTES

1 Research results obtained through a joint agreement between the National Aeronautics & Space Administration, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the EPA/NASA Sub-Agreement EPA 80-D-X0740 at the National Space Technology Laboratories (NSTL), NSTL Station, MS 39529.

2 Senior Res. Scientist, NASA/NSTL; Res. Chemist, NASA/NSTL; and Res. Aquatic Biologist, USEPA/Robert S. Kerr Environ. Res. Lab., respectively.

Received for publication March 29, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Waste Management ResearchHome page
D. L. Bubenheim
Plants for Water Recycling, Oxygen Regeneration and Food Production
Waste Management Research, January 1, 1991; 9(1): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.