JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 12:109-113 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, P.

Effects of Surface Treatment and Interplanting of Shrub Alder on Growth of Douglas-fir on Coal Spoils1

Paul Heilman2

ABSTRACT

Annual growth of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) planted on topsoiled spoils at a coal mine near Centralia, Wash., was monitored for the first 5 y after planting. Treatments were contour bedding, contour bedding plus interplanted Sitka alder (Alnus sinuata (Reg.) Rydb.), and unbedded control. The bedding significantly increased growth of Douglas-fir in all 5 y of the study. Total height growth after 5 y was 35% greater than control on the bedding only plots, and 43% greater on the bedding plus Sitka alder plots. Height growth of Douglas-fir in the mixed stand was significantly greater during the 2nd and 3rd y of the study, but after 5 y, no significant difference was evident in total height between the mixed and pure Douglas-fir plots. Concentration of N in Douglas-fir foliage was significantly increased by bedding in the fifth but not in the fourth year. Interplanting with Sitka alder had no significant effect on N in Douglas-fir foliage.

The top 0.3 m of soil in the ridged portion of the bedded area contained significantly less moisture over a summer than did the top 0.3 m of the unbedded soil. At deeper depths, however, soil moisture was not significantly affected by bedding.

Wind damage caused by a severe storm that occurred after 5 y was very much greater on the unbedded plots (49% wind-thrown vs. 9 to 15% wind-thrown on the bedded plots) despite the smaller size of the trees on unbedded plots.

Key Words: Pseudotsuga menziesiiAlnus sinuata • bedding • topsoil replacement • foliar N • soil N • spoil moisture • wind damage


NOTES

1 Contribution from Washington State University College of Agriculture Research Center, Pullman, WA 99164. Scientific Paper no. 6216. Project 0531. This research was partly funded by a grant from Washington Irrigation Development Company (WIDCO), Centralia, WA.

2 Forest Scientist, Western Washington Research and Extension Center, Puyallup, WA 98371.

Received for publication April 16, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.