JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:690-694 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Letchworth, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Letchworth, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heagle, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Letchworth, M. B.

Relationships Among Injury, Growth, and Yield Responses of Soybean Cultivars Exposed to Ozone at Different Light Intensities1

Allen S. Heagle and Michael B. Letchworth2

ABSTRACT

Four soybean cultivars (Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Forrest, Davis, Ransom, and Bragg) differing in foliar sensitivity and shoot weight response to O3 during vegetative growth were exposed to O3 from the seedling stage to maturity to determine if the yield response correlated with the vegetative response. Neither the foliar injury nor the vegetative shoot weight response of cultivars to O3 allowed reasonable prediction of the cultivar yield response to O3. This inadequacy may relate to differences in cultivar tolerance. Bragg, with moderate amounts of O3-induced injury and with decreased growth, yielded as well as the controls. Davis, with moderate amounts of O3-induced injury and decreased growth, yielded 34% less than the controls. The four cultivars were grown in open-top field chambers with different degrees of shading to determine whether light intensity would alter their response to O3. Light intensity in nonshaded open-top chambers was 9% less than that in an open field; chambers with shade cloth covering the sides or tops decreased light intensity by 15 and 19%, respectively. The shade treatments did not change overall yield response to O3 or the relative cultivar yield response to O3.

Key Words: open-top field chambers • air pollution


NOTES

1 Cooperative investigations of the USDA and North Carolina State University. Paper no. 8185 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agrcultural Research Service, Raleigh.

2 Research Plant Pahtologist, USDA-ARS, Plant Pathology Dep., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27650; and Research Assistant, Plant Pathology Dep., North Carolina State Univ.; respectively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K. O. Burkey, J. E. Miller, and E. L. Fiscus
Assessment of Ambient Ozone Effects on Vegetation Using Snap Bean as a Bioindicator Species
J. Environ. Qual., May 11, 2005; 34(3): 1081 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.