JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:638-644 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by King, L. D.

Land Application of Untreated Industrial Waste Water1

Larry D. King2

ABSTRACT

Excessive pretreatment of waste water prior to land application unduly increases the cost and energy requirement of land treatment systems. This study was conducted to determine if untreated industrial waste water can be applied to soil without adversely affecting crop growth and soil properties or posing a ground-water pollution hazard.

Untreated (UW) and treated (TW) waste water were diverted from the treatment plant at a fiberboard mill and spray-irrigated on fescue-grass (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) on Cecil soil (clayey kaolinitic, thermic Typic Hapludult) at 1.4 cm/week. After 2 years the treatments were changed to 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 cm UW/week and continued for 2 more years.

Grass yields with UW and TW were equal to or greater than yields with inorganic fertilizer and no irrigation (control treatment). Recovery of waste-water-applied N via crop harvest ranged from 20 to 30%. Analysis of washed and unwashed grass samples showed that increased Mn concentrations were due to waste-water solids adhering to the sample, rather than to increased Mn uptake. Concentrations of Ni, Pb, and Cr of unwashed samples were increased slightly but were far below concentrations toxic to livestock.

Soil nitrate concentrations resulting from UW applications were generally not significantly different from concentration in the control treatment except when UW contained appreciable quantities of inorganic N. There was evidence that denitrification was a significant N sink.

Waste-water irrigation increased concentrations of soil P, K, and Ca and increased soil pH to 7.4–7.8. Sodium accumulated in the subsoil to an exchangeable-Na percentage of 10.

Results of the study showed that extensive pretreatment was not necessary prior to irrigation with the waste water.

Key Words: sodium • manganese • nitrogen movement • nitrogen recovery • denitrification • irrigation


NOTES

1 Paper no. 8026 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh. Research supported in part by funds from Masonite Corp., Spring Hope, N.C.

2 Assistant Professor, Dep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27650.

Received for publication October 1, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.