JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:545-549 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kachanoski, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.

Comparison of the Soil Water Cycle in Clear-Cut and Forested Sites1

R. G. Kachanoski and E. de Jong2

ABSTRACT

A study was undertaken to determine the importance of subsurface flow and drainage in a northern Saskatchewan forested basin, and to examine the effect of clear-cutting on the hydrologic cycle. Components of the soil water cycle were estimated for clear-cut and forested sites during the spring melt and growing season. Surface runoff was measured using interceptor troughs and tipping-bucket gauges. Soil water contents were measured using a neutron probe. Soil water fluxes were calculated using Darcy's Law and mass-balance equations. Creek flow was monitored using a water-level recorder and still well. Surface runoff was insignificant on all plots during the growing well. Surface runoff was insignificant on all plots during the growing season. Clear-cutting increased hillslope water yield fivefold during the snowmelt period and doubled drainage during the growing season, compared with the forested site. Stream hydrographs indicated the basin was dominated by subsurface flow. This was consistent with measurement made on the forested plots where calculated drainage values could account for almost all observed streamflow. Hydrograph separation was carried out using mass-balance calculations of Ca and Mg. The separation was used to identify sources of subsurface water contributing to streamflow.

Key Words: subsurface flow • drainage • snowmelt • hydrograph separation


NOTES

1 Contribution no. R301 of the Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0W0. Supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and by the Saskatchewan Research Council through a scholarship to the senior author.

2 Former Graduate Student and Professor of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, respectively. The senior author is presently at the Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Received for publication September 24, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.