JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:506-511 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boni, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boni, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Adriano, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boni, A. L.

Plutonium Contents and Fluxes in a Soybean Crop Ecosystem Near a Nuclear Fuel Chemical Separations Facility1

D. C. Adriano, J. E. Pinder, III, K. W. Mc Leod, J. C. Corey and A. L. Boni2

ABSTRACT

A soybean (Glycine max) crop was grown in fields within 1 km of a nuclear fuel chemical separations plant at the Savannah River Plant, S.C. Aerial releases of 238Pu and 239,240Pu have been occurring at various rates during the past 25 years and have produced characteristic Pu isotopic ratios (ISR) in various environmental matrices. This unique situation, along with pot studies and a farm site receiving only global fallout, provided the opportunity to study various biological and physical processes that determine Pu contamination of ecosystems and their components.

Contamination of the external surfaces of the soybeans contributed more to Pu contamination than did root uptake and translocation. Contamination of beans harvested with a combine was also mostly surficial, indicating that physical processes are more important than biological processes in this "real-world" situation. Pu-bearing particles directly deposited from the point source (62-m stack) and soil-surface resuspendible materials were the primary contaminants for the vegetation, while resuspension and transfer of Pu-bearing particles from vegetative surfaces were the dominant ones for the harvested beans. The Pu input from this particular chemical separations facility to the foodstuff (soybean beans) contributed little to radiation dose to humans compared with the natural background radiation.

Key Words: plutonium deposition • transuranics • plutonium cycling • dose assessment • nuclear energy


NOTES

1 This research was conducted under the auspices of contracts EY-76-C-09-0819 and AT(07-2)-1 between the U.S. Dep. of Energy and the University of Georgia's Savannah River Ecology Laboratory and E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co.'s Savannah River Laboratory, respectively.

2 Associate Professor of Agronomy, Assistant Ecologist, and Assistant Ecologist, respectively, Savannah River Ecology Lab., Box E, Aiken, SC 29801; and Research Supervisors, Savannah River Lab., E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Aiken.

Received for publication September 29, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
S. Golmakani, M. V. Moghaddam, and T. Hosseini
FACTORS AFFECTING THE TRANSFER OF RADIONUCLIDES FROM THE ENVIRONMENT TO PLANTS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 16, 2008; (2008) ncn063v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.