JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:347-351 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lance, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lance, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.-S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lance, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.-S.

Comparative Movement of Different Enteroviruses in Soil Columns1

J. C. Lance, C. P. Gerba and D.-S. Wang2

ABSTRACT

Echo 1 and Echo 29, the least adsorptive viruses studied in previous batch studies with small soil samples, and Polio 1 were seeded in secondary sewage effluent that was applied to 250-cm-long soil columns. Water samples from various column depths showed that the adsorption patterns for Echo 29 and Polio 1 were quite similar. Fewer Echo 1 viruses were adsorbed near the soil surface, but the leaching pattern below the 40-cm depth resembled that for Polio 1 and Echo 29. The leaching patterns of Echo 1 and Polio 1 were influenced in a similar manner by changes in virus concentration, and flow velocity and leaching patterns were similar for three other soils with a wide range in virus-retention efficiencies. These tests and previous experiments on virus adsorption and survival suggest that movement of polioviruses type 1 through soils is similar to the movement of many other enteroviruses through soils. Virus movement through loamy sand roughly paralleled that of fecal coliforms.

Key Words: virus • sewage • adsorption • waste water


NOTES

1 Contribution of the USDA-ARS in cooperation with the Dep. of Virology and Epidemiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030. The work conducted at Baylor College of Medicine was supported by USEPA Res. Grant no. R-805, 292.

2 Formerly Soil Scientist, U.S. Water Conservation Lab., Phoenix, Ariz., now National Research Program Leader, National Program Staff, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705; formerly Virologist, Baylor College of Medicine, now Associate Professor, Dep. of Microbiology and Nutrition and Food Service, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724; and formerly Post-Doctoral Fellow, Baylor College of Medicine, now Research Associate, Univ. of Texas Medical School, Houston; respectively.

Received for publication January 17, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. S. Frazier, C. S. Frazier, R. C. Graham, P. J. Shouse, M. V. Yates, and M. A. Anderson
A Field Study of Water Flow and Virus Transport in Weathered Granitic Bedrock
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2002; 1(1): 113 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. E. Dowd, S. D. Pillai, S. Wang, and M. Y. Corapcioglu
Delineating the Specific Influence of Virus Isoelectric Point and Size on Virus Adsorption and Transport through Sandy Soils
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 1998; 64(2): 405 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.