JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:267-272 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olson, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olson, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.

Disposal of Feedlot Lagoon Water by Irrigating Bromegrass: I. Crop Removal of Nitrogen1

R. V. Olson, R. V. Terry, W. L. Powers and C. W. Swallow2

ABSTRACT

Beef-feedlot lagoon water was used to irrigate bromegrass (Bromus inermis) at four rates in three replications for 4 years to determine effectiveness of the grass in removing N. Microplots within the main plots of two treatments received lagoon water enriched with 15N. Bromegrass was harvested two or three times each year. Yields and total N uptake were determined for the main plots, and yields, total N uptake, and lagoon water N uptake for microplots.

Yields and total N uptake increased with lagoon water rates, but declined with time on the main plots because of effects of excessive moisture on stands. In the microplots, reseeded to maintain stands, yields increased with time. With both main plots and microplots, more total N was removed by the hay than was applied with the 2.5- and 5.1-cm treatments, but the opposite prevailed for 7.6- and 10.2-cm irrigations.

Uptake of lagoon water N was 1.8 times more for the 10.2- than for the 5.1-cm treatment. The percentage of lagoon water N removed increased with time but seemed to be leveling off at about 40 after 4 years.

Crop removal of N in waste water can be a major N disposal method if crop yields are high. Bromegrass is not the best crop because stands are reduced by excessive moisture. Low rates of lagoon water are more effective than high rates because they leave less lagoon water N in the soil and more total N is taken up than applied.

Key Words: pollution • 15N • isotopes


NOTES

1 Contribution 81-444-J, Department of Agronomy, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Professor, Graduate Research Assistant, former Professor, and Associate Professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Dr. Powers is now Director, Water Resources Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583.

Received for publication May 26, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.