JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 11:236-240 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, W. M.

Environmental Effects of a Medium-Fertility 12-Month Pasture Program: I. Hydrology and Soil Loss1

L. B. Owens, R. W. van Keuren and W. M. Edwards2

ABSTRACT

Four small, sloping upland watersheds in Ohio (0.5–1.1 ha) were studied for 5 years to investigate hydrologic and soil erosion changes resulting from a beef cattle pasturing program. The cattle grazed all four pastures rotationally during the summer (May–October) and were wintered on hay (November–April) on the same pasture each year. The long-term record for these pastures, which had been in meadow and light pasturing during the previous years, showed average annual surface runoff to be approximately 15 mm. During the 5 years of the grazing project, the three summer-grazing-only pastures showed a slight increase in surface runoff and a trace of soil loss. However, the winter-feeding/summer-grazing area showed a large increase in surface runoff (131 mm/year) and soil loss (1,355 kg/ha per year). Eighty-one percent of the soil loss occurred during the dormant season. Large runoff events, although a small percentage of the total number of events, produced most of the runoff volume and most of the soil loss. Water balance studies indicated that subsurface flow was relatively unchanged by the grazing program. The increase in surface runoff was offset by a decrease in the evapotranspiration.

Key Words: surface runoff • subsurface flow • soil erosion • water balance • watershed • winter-feeding


NOTES

1 Contribution of the USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, Coshocton, OH 43812, in cooperation with the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691. Research supported in part by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grant R-804631. The EPA does not necessarily endorse any commercial products used in the study, and the conclusions herein represent the views of the authors and not necessarily the opinions, policies, or recommendation of EPA.

2 Soil Scientist, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed; Professor of Agronomy, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr.; and Soil Scientist, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, respectively.

Received for publication June 4, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.